
AI-generated conceptual illustration, not a photograph of my home or loan statement.
After buying a ₹56 lakh home, my question was not simply how to pay the EMI. Should available capital close the loan, or remain invested? I shared that decision and subsequent figures in my videos. To understand the story, we must separate the property price, loan, investment balance and SWP withdrawals.
A ₹56 lakh home: four different amounts
In my video published on 13 July 2025, I described buying a resale home for ₹56 lakh at age 27, with an Axis Bank home loan. The repeated loan and EMI figures also match my earlier home-buying article. This is a historical personal account, not my current outstanding loan statement.
| Item | Amount reported | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Property price | ₹56,00,000 | Home price, not investment capital |
| Down payment | ₹11,00,000 | Initial payment towards the home |
| Home loan | ₹45,70,225 | Includes reported insurance of ₹70,225 |
| Monthly EMI | ₹37,599 | A contractual payment obligation |
| Original term | 25 years / 300 months | Floating-rate schedule can change |
The first EMI date stated in the video was 10 May 2023. The old snapshot showed an 8.75% floating rate; that is not a current-rate quote. The ₹56 lakh property and ₹45 lakh investment are different amounts doing different jobs. Without separately available investible capital, this example cannot simply be copied.
What did the later video report?
In Why I took a home loan despite having the money, published on 6 September 2026, I discussed a ₹45 lakh Axis Small Cap investment and figures as of 10 August 2026. The remaining balance is repeated several times in that video:
| Item | Reported amount or count |
|---|---|
| Initial investment | ₹45,00,000 |
| Remaining value,10 August 2026 | ₹68,71,769 |
| Monthly SWP | ₹37,599 |
| Reported withdrawals | 40 |
| 40 × ₹37,599 | ₹15,03,960 |
Evidence boundary: This is the personal record shared in my published video, not an independent bank or AMC audit. It is not today’s portfolio value, nor an expected outcome for somebody else. The complete transaction-level statement, each allotment and tax payments have not been audited here.
₹68.72 lakh remaining, ₹15.04 lakh withdrawn: what does that mean?
Adding the balance and withdrawals gives ₹83,75,729. Subtracting the reported ₹45 lakh initial investment gives a simple difference of ₹38,75,729. Calling that an annual return or net spendable profit would be wrong. Withdrawals occurred on different dates; an annualised personal return needs every dated cash flow and an XIRR calculation.
An SWP sells units. The full withdrawal is not necessarily profit; part may be your own capital. Without checking applicable tax, exit load and any other cash flows, the difference above is not net profit. This article does not invent an XIRR or update the balance using a current NAV.
Does prepayment leave you with only a house?
That comparison is incomplete. Closing a loan releases its EMI. If the borrower invests that amount each month, they can build a corpus too. A borrower keeping the loan can retain a lump sum investment, but the EMI still needs funding from somewhere.
For a fair illustration, both people below start with ₹45,70,225 and have the same ₹37,599 monthly budget from income. One closes the loan and invests ₹37,599 at each month-end. The other invests the lump sum and uses that monthly income budget for the EMI. This is a separate hypothetical comparison, not a recalculation of the ₹45 lakh personal record above.
| Assumed constant annual return | Prepay + monthly investment | Keep loan + lump sum |
|---|---|---|
| 6% | ₹2.54 crore | ₹1.96 crore |
| 10% | ₹4.64 crore | ₹4.95 crore |
| 12% | ₹6.34 crore | ₹7.77 crore |
25 years,300 month-end contributions, monthly rate derived from an effective annual return. Tax, fees, inflation and loan-rate changes excluded. Both own the same assumed home; property appreciation is not added. These are assumptions, not future rates or guaranteed wealth. A different actual floating-loan schedule changes the comparison.
At the lower assumed return, disciplined investing after prepayment finishes ahead. At higher returns, the lump sum may lead. Comparing a past fund return with a loan rate alone misses uncertainty, tax and the cost of taking risk.
The EMI is due even when markets fall
The earlier calculator example starts with ₹45,70,225 and withdraws ₹37,599 monthly for 25 years. At a hypothetical constant 6% annual return, this month-end withdrawal model cannot fund the full scheduled withdrawal in month 185. At 10%, roughly ₹31.45 lakh remains. The approximately ₹33.68 crore shown at 22% comes from a very high, continuously sustained return assumption. It is not a realised-profit statement.
Markets do not deliver identical returns each month. Selling units during early declines can leave fewer units to participate in a later recovery. This is sequence-of-returns risk. Small-cap funds can face substantial volatility, drawdowns and liquidity risk. A long holding period does not eliminate those risks.
Rather than relying exclusively on small-cap SWP for an essential EMI, review dependable income, an emergency reserve and a plan for withdrawals during weak markets. The appropriate reserve depends on employment, family needs and other liabilities. My personal choice is not proof of suitability for everyone.
Five questions before choosing
- Actual borrowing cost: Current rate, resets, remaining term and only the tax benefit you genuinely receive.
- Alternative EMI funding: Which income or safer reserve pays the instalment during a market downturn?
- Purpose of the capital: Do not put home funding, education needs and emergency money into one undifferentiated risk bucket.
- Discipline on both sides: After prepaying, will the released EMI really be invested, or spent?
- Peace of mind: Being debt-free has value. Partial prepayment alongside investment may also be an option.
My takeaway: before asking how many crores a model produces, ask how the EMI survives a bad period. Decide around your income, risk capacity and timeframe. This article does not recommend borrowing to invest in small-cap funds.
Sources, dates and calculation method
- Original video,13 July 2025:0:10 property price;2:17 loan;2:40 EMI;3:39 historical floating rate;5:14 insurance/down payment;12:30 onwards hypothetical SWP projections.
- Related update,6 September 2026:3:34 loan/EMI;3:51–4:15 investment and cutoff;7:44–8:01 remaining balance and 40 withdrawals.
- My earlier home-loan article: loan figures and calculator context.
Monthly rate m=(1+r)^(1/12)−1; lump sum=P(1+m)^300; month-end SIP=EMI×[(1+m)^300−1]/m. SWP applies the assumed monthly growth, then subtracts that month’s withdrawal. Amounts are rounded. Personal-record and model starting amounts differ and are not mixed into a performance calculation.
Disclosure: Financial education, not personalised investment advice. Mutual funds are subject to market risk; past outcomes do not guarantee future returns. I am an AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor and may receive commission when investments are made in Regular Plans through my distributor link. Read scheme documents and consult a SEBI-registered investment adviser for personalised advice.
सभी टिप्पणियाँ / All Comments
No published comments yet.
Related reading
Some linked articles are in Hindi.
IDCW मिला: क्या ये पूरा मुनाफा है? →
Gold Has Fallen: Check This Before You Buy →
Smallcap गिरे तो SIP रोकें या जारी रखें? →
Small-Cap ETF vs Active Fund: Is Cheaper Really Better? →
SIP का असली रिटर्न कितना? XIRR और Absolute Return समझें →
चर्चा / Comments